If it weren't for you meddling kids
At the end of each episode of Scooby Doo, the villain always says, “and I would have gotten away with it if it weren’t for you meddling kids.” That’s how I feel about the guys at Catallarchy.net.
Well I may be an unemployed man without a wife or girlfriend still living with my parents despite being over the age of 30, but at least I’m not so stupid as to think that a gorgeous young girl would be the author of a popular libertarian blog. She’d be too busy having fun. The kind of fun found in this post, except it would be happening every night instead of just being a one time event. You guys are so gullible!
Libertarians tend to be ugly because it’s an anti-majority philosophy. People who are attractive have an easy time going through life and derive far too many advantages from the status quo to ever question it. It’s only outsiders, who are usually ugly, who join up with fringe movements.
One thing I learned from this blog is how easy attractive woman have it. When I had a blog as my real self, no one linked to me, no one left any comments, it was as if the blog existed in a vacuum. But things were different for Libertarian Girl. Every day I’d check Technorati and discover new unsolicited links. It was like I had warped into an alternate universe where all the rules had changed. At the rate things were happening, this would have been an A-list blog in a few more months.
It’s funny how there have been some posts in the blogosphere saying that the political blogosphere was a boys club that discriminated against women, as evidenced by how few politics bloggers were women. Boy were they completely off the mark. It’s ten times easier for a woman’s blog to become popular.
This effect no doubt carries over into the real world. Whenever I see an attractive woman with a successful career, I’ll remember the experience of this blog and assume that she didn’t really get there on merit, just her looks.
Some people might think there’s something homosexual about me pretending to be a girl, but don’t worry, I assure you that I have the hots for the girl in the picture just like all of you, and I have absolutely zero sexual desire for any of my male readers. There’s nothing more homosexual here than any male fiction writer writing female characters.
I’m going to miss this blog. It was fun having a blog that people actually read, even though it only lasted for less than two months. I should have figured that the type of people who read libertarian blogs are the same type that read Russian brides websites. When I make my next hoax blog, I’ll make sure to use a more obscure photo.
By the way, does anyone know if there really are gorgeous young women in Russia willing to marry much older and uglier men from the United States? Or is it just a scam?

You do have a lot of time on your hands man!
Posted by: M | February 13, 2005 at 10:44 PM
The girl thing was only half of it. The bizarre statist stuff you posted would have drawn similar response if you'd called yourself Libertarian Boy and any blog post with 'breast' in the title always draws traffic.
And I went and linked this blog just in time for the unmasking...
Posted by: Tom Hanna | February 13, 2005 at 11:17 PM
OK now that I have recovered from the initial emotional shock (and seized the opportunity to promote my own blog) I have more to say.
I am one of the people who would not have read LG's blog if I knew it was written by a man. I don't have the time to read non-local political blogs, especially those with such ideological inconsistency and lower-quality political analysis. But as a straight woman I was not reading this blog for the reasons LG assumes.
I was so happy and excited to find another young libertarian woman in the blogosphere. There are so few young women in the movement -- when I go to the local Libertarian Party meetings, it's 90% men, and the other women there are all middle aged moms and lesbians. I don't really have anything in common with them outside of politics. I'm very lonely and wish so much to find more women like me to be friends with. Someone to chat politics and swap makeup and gossip about guys with.
Here I found what I thought was a potential gal pal to hang out with if/when I eventually move to the DC area. I also wanted to encourage "her" to keep blogging, and hopefully help nudge "her" in a more libertarian direction, even though sometimes "she" drove me absofreakinlutely nuts with some of the statist crap "she" posted while calling "herself" a Libertarian. I even went and commented on other blogs to defend "her" against criticism.
So while it was a clever hoax and I appreciate the wit behind it and in some of LG's posts and retorts, I am very sad and disappointed that LG is not for real. :(
Posted by: Jacqueline | February 14, 2005 at 12:07 AM
Wow, Jackie seems especially put out by the whole thing.
We may have to put her on suicide watch for a while.
Jackie, I know you are angry that Libertarian Girl betrayed you, but you can do much better than her anyway! You go girl! She be thinking she's all that, but it's her loss!
Posted by: dadahead | February 14, 2005 at 01:19 AM
I would also like to re-iterate that there are still two unanswered questions about this whole thing:
1. Who, exactly, was browsing through the Russian mail-order bride catalog and noticed a picture of Libertarian Girl?
2. What, exactly, was Libertarian Girl herself doing browsing through the Russian mail-order bride catalog in order to find the picture in the first place?
Posted by: dadahead | February 14, 2005 at 01:26 AM
"I'd like to hear more about the differences in your audience pre-girl vs. post-girl I'd love to see a traffic chart, if you've got the data..."
--Michael Duff
I'm sure Ann Coulter gets asked the same thing all the time.
Seriously, I suspected LG was really Glenn Reynolds. That post where she gushed that "Glenn Reynolds himself says...." really set off my radar.
Posted by: Kevin Carson | February 14, 2005 at 01:27 AM
On the other hand, a minority of warmongers and apologists can be seen in the light of the apparent fabrications which lead to the final subjugation of the Middle East, beginning with the $90bn invasion of Iraq. Nevertheless, the apparent demise of "anti-Americanism" as a respectable means of stifling recognition of American imperialism represents the crushing of internal dissent in order to propagate the end of any possibility of social justice in a reactionary state. Let us never forget that the 15-minute speech delivered Monday night by President Bush is determined by capitalist interests which lead to the essential Western imperial interests. Presumably, the deal between the Department of Defense and Halliburton unit Kellogg, Brown & Root leads our attention to the slaughter of thousands of children by Air Force cluster bombs.
Posted by: | February 14, 2005 at 08:44 AM
I don't mind him pretending to be a woman. Actually he was better at that than pretending to be a libertarian.
Posted by: David | February 14, 2005 at 08:48 AM
This seems oddly similar to:
www.blackpeopleloveus.com
"We are well-liked by Black people so we're psyched (since lots of Black people don't like lots of White people)!! We thought it'd be cool to honor our exceptional status with a ROCKIN' domain name and a killer website!!"
Posted by: Bill | February 14, 2005 at 09:18 AM
/begin traffic-whoring/
I no longer qualify as a "girl", but I am a hardcore pro-freedom femme. Anyone looking for real content from a real woman (plenty of people are around to verify the pics on my site are indeed of me) is welcome to drop by. :-)
/end traffic-whoring/
Posted by: Sunni | February 14, 2005 at 09:59 AM
Brilliant.
Posted by: praktike | February 14, 2005 at 01:32 PM
I hate to agree with a rabid leftist, but dadahead has hit the nail on the head - what are you people doing looking for mail order brides?
Posted by: Tom Hanna | February 14, 2005 at 06:52 PM
Great to see the whole libertarian movement caught in the headlights like a deer!
Posted by: captainblak | February 14, 2005 at 07:02 PM
It was outed as a non-libertarian long before it was outed as a girl. Great to see the liberals and leftists caught in the headlights like a deer.
Posted by: Imposter | February 14, 2005 at 07:25 PM
LG, I seriously doubt your short run as a semi-attractive woman on the internet makes you an authority on how easy it is to be an attractive woman.
Here's a thought... imagine having your ass grabbed by men as ugly as you. I wouldn't call that the good life.
Posted by: Redneck Feminist | February 15, 2005 at 02:08 PM
wait... i missed it.. where's the old picture? and who was she?
Posted by: jen | February 15, 2005 at 06:03 PM
'LG, I seriously doubt your short run as a semi-attractive woman on the internet makes you an authority on how easy it is to be an attractive woman.
Here's a thought... imagine having your ass grabbed by men as ugly as you. I wouldn't call that the good life.'
Ha. I totally agree. This guy is such an asshole. It looks like he wanted to prove what he already believed in real life. Typical sexist shit. This whole woman turns out to be man thing is getting so old.
What? Are you fucking jealous? It looks like you are. You whine about not getting enough posts because your not a woman. Take a way a little bit of your power and your fragile male ego crumbles into dust.
'It must be her looks that's why they don't want me.' I bet that's what a lot of guys tell themselves when women one up them. But it was my 'job' men say, those were my 'posts'. Your entitlement reeks.
If you had to be a 'real' woman everyday maybe you'd understand how repugnant your little scam is...
Posted by: sean | February 15, 2005 at 09:10 PM
Ha-ha.
sean jerked off to the picture.
Posted by: DTLV | February 15, 2005 at 09:19 PM
Sean's a girl asshole. And fuck you.
Posted by: Sean | February 15, 2005 at 09:41 PM
looks like he wanted to prove what he already believed in real life.
No, I wasn't out to prove anything, I just wanted to have a popular blog. I was suprised, actually, at how well it worked.
Posted by: Libertarian Loser Guy | February 15, 2005 at 10:20 PM
wow, you really are a loser
Posted by: sean | February 15, 2005 at 11:35 PM
I found this post absolutely hilarious. I had never been to this website before hearing about the "scandal," but the wit was definitely present as you went down while still making fun of everyone. I've got to say, I laughed.
Posted by: Robert Mayer | February 16, 2005 at 04:06 AM
I've never even heard of you until I saw the link at Feministe. What's scary is that you look like a guy I used to do stage tech. work with. Your name isn't Jeff, by any chance, is it? :)
Probably not. Jeff didn't go to comic book conventions.
Posted by: Trish Wilson | February 16, 2005 at 08:45 AM
"One thing I learned from this blog is how easy attractive woman have it"
Cry me a river, mate. I am so sick of this blogging double-standard. Just because women write doesn't mean they are popular because they have skin sidebar pics. We get to deal with masses of double standards, kind of enforced by acts like this-where a guy poses as a girl who poses to be someone who has had a visit by the Humanitarian Fairy. You're the second popular mail blogger who felt the need to post as a woman, and in both cases, I just shake my head and think: "Someone, please tell these boys that Tootsie is SO over."
Sad mate.
You got your 30 seconds, at least.
Posted by: Helen | February 16, 2005 at 11:13 AM
Proof is in the puddin', Helen, my sweet. He puts a picture of a hot babe in the corner, all of a sudden "he's" popular.
Libertarian Loser guy, well done!!
Wasn't this the premise of "Remington Steele"? :lol:
Posted by: johnnymozart | February 16, 2005 at 05:19 PM